CVE-2023-53728

posix-timers: Ensure timer ID search-loop limit is valid

N/A
Published: October 22, 2025 at 01:23 PM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 06:45 AM UTC
1 product affected across 1 vendorLinux Kernel

Using Linux by Linux?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Linux - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
N/A
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.2%

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: posix-timers: Ensure timer ID search-loop limit is valid posix_timer_add() tries to allocate a posix timer ID by starting from the cached ID which was stored by the last successful allocation. This is done in a loop searching the ID space for a free slot one by one. The loop has to terminate when the search wrapped around to the starting point. But that's racy vs. establishing the starting point. That is read out lockless, which leads to the following problem: CPU0 CPU1 posix_timer_add() start = sig->posix_timer_id; lock(hash_lock); ... posix_timer_add() if (++sig->posix_timer_id < 0) start = sig->posix_timer_id; sig->posix_timer_id = 0; So CPU1 can observe a negative start value, i.e. -1, and the loop break never happens because the condition can never be true: if (sig->posix_timer_id == start) break; While this is unlikely to ever turn into an endless loop as the ID space is huge (INT_MAX), the racy read of the start value caught the attention of KCSAN and Dmitry unearthed that incorrectness. Rewrite it so that all id operations are under the hash lock.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

3.10 ≤ v < 4.14.3223.10 ≤ v < 4.19.2913.10 ≤ v < 5.10.1883.10 ≤ v < 5.15.1503.10 ≤ v < 5.4.2513.10 ≤ v < 6.1.1073.10 ≤ v < 6.4.73.10 ≤ v < 6.53.105ed67f05f66c41e39880a6d61358438a25f9fee5
Vendor states this is fixed in 322377cc909defcca9451487484845e7e1d20d1b (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 37175e25edf7cc0d5a2cd2c2a1cbe2dcbf4a1937 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6a0ac84501b4fec73a1a823c55cf13584c43f418 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 8ad6679a5bb97cdb3e14942729292b4bfcc0e223 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 8ce8849dd1e78dadcee0ec9acbd259d239b7069f (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 8dc52c200b889bc1cb34288fbf623d4ff381d2ae (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 9ea26a8494a0a9337e7415eafd6f3ed940327dc5 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in ef535e0315afd098c4beb1da364847eca4b56a20 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 3.10 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 4.14.322 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 4.19.291 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.10.188 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.15.150 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.4.251 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.1.107 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.4.7 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 6.5 (unaffected)

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet, and no fixed version or vendor advisory is recorded against it.

Quick Info

StatusDEFERRED

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card