CVE-2023-44204

Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved: The rpd will crash upon receiving a malformed BGP UPDATE message

MEDIUM
6.5
CVSS Score
Published: October 12, 2023 at 11:06 PM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 06:27 AM UTC
3 products affected across 2 vendorsJunosJunos OS EvolvedJunos OS Evolved

Using Junos OS by Juniper Networks?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Junos OS - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
MEDIUM6.5
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.3%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

An Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input vulnerability in Routing Protocol Daemon (rpd) Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated, network based attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS). When a malformed BGP UPDATE packet is received over an established BGP session, the rpd crashes and restarts. This issue affects both eBGP and iBGP implementations. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS * 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R3-S4; * 22.1 versions prior to 22.1R3-S3; * 22.2 versions prior to 22.2R3-S2; * 22.3 versions prior to 22.3R2-S2, 22.3R3; * 22.4 versions prior to 22.4R2-S1, 22.4R3; * 23.2 versions prior to 23.2R1, 23.2R2; Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved * 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R3-S5-EVO; * 22.1 versions prior to 22.1R3-S3-EVO; * 22.2 versions prior to 22.2R3-S3-EVO; * 22.3 versions prior to 22.3R2-S2-EVO; * 22.4 versions prior to 22.4R3-EVO; * 23.2 versions prior to 23.2R2-EVO;

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

Affected range stops below 21.4R3-S4, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 22.1R3-S3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 22.2R3-S2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 22.3R2-S2, 22.3R3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 22.4R2-S1, 22.4R3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 23.2R1, 23.2R2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
21.4-EVO ≤ v < 21.4R3-S5-EVO22.1-EVO ≤ v < 22.1R3-S3-EVO22.2-EVO ≤ v < 22.2R3-S3-EVO22.3-EVO ≤ v < 22.3R2-S2-EVO22.4-EVO ≤ v < 22.4R3-EVO23.2-EVO ≤ v < 23.2R2-EVO21.4-EVO22.1-EVO22.2-EVO22.3-EVO22.4-EVO23.2-EVO
Affected range stops below 21.4R3-S5-EVO, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 22.1R3-S3-EVO, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 22.2R3-S3-EVO, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 22.3R2-S2-EVO, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 22.4R3-EVO, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 23.2R2-EVO, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

Patch and advisory references

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitNot automatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

6.5MEDIUMjuniper
Attack Vector
ADJACENT_NETWORK
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
NONE
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
NONE
Integrity
NONE
Availability
HIGH
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusANALYZED
CWE
CWE-1286CWE-20

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card