CVE-2023-36836

Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved: In a MoFRR scenario an rpd core may be observed when a low privileged CLI command is executed

MEDIUM
4.7
CVSS Score
Published: July 14, 2023 at 05:33 PM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 06:07 AM UTC
3 products affected across 2 vendorsJunosJunos OS EvolvedJunos OS Evolved

Using Junos OS by Juniper Networks?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Junos OS - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
MEDIUM4.7
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.2%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

A Use of an Uninitialized Resource vulnerability in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows a local, authenticated attacker with low privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS). On all Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved platforms, in a Multicast only Fast Reroute (MoFRR) scenario, the rpd process can crash when a a specific low privileged CLI command is executed. The rpd crash will impact all routing protocols until the process has automatically been restarted. As the operational state which makes this issue exploitable is outside the attackers control, this issue is considered difficult to exploit. Continued execution of this command will lead to a sustained DoS. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS 19.4 version 19.4R3-S5 and later versions prior to 19.4R3-S9; 20.1 version 20.1R2 and later versions; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R3-S7; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R3-S5; 20.4 versions prior to 20.4R3-S6; 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R3-S4; 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R3-S2; 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R3-S1; 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R3; 22.1 versions prior to 22.1R1-S2, 22.1R2; 22.2 versions prior to 22.2R2. Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved All versions prior to 20.4R3-S6-EVO; 21.1-EVO version 21.1R1-EVO and later versions; 21.2-EVO version 21.2R1-EVO and later versions; 21.3-EVO versions prior to 21.3R3-S1-EVO; 21.4-EVO versions prior to 21.4R3-EVO; 22.1-EVO versions prior to 22.1R1-S2-EVO, 22.1R2-EVO; 22.2-EVO versions prior to 22.2R2-EVO.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

Affected range stops below 19.4*, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 20.1*, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 20.2R3-S7, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 20.3R3-S5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 20.4R3-S6, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 21.1R3-S4, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 21.2R3-S2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 21.3R3-S1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 21.4R3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 22.1R1-S2, 22.1R2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 22.2R2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 20.4R3-S6-EVO21.1 ≤ v < 21.1*21.2 ≤ v < 21.2*21.3 ≤ v < 21.3R3-S1-EVO21.4 ≤ v < 21.4R3-EVO22.1 ≤ v < 22.1R1-S2-EVO, 22.1R2-EVO22.2 ≤ v < 22.2R2-EVO21.121.221.321.422.122.2
Affected range stops below 20.4R3-S6-EVO, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 21.1*, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 21.2*, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 21.3R3-S1-EVO, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 21.4R3-EVO, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 22.1R1-S2-EVO, 22.1R2-EVO, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 22.2R2-EVO, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

Patch and advisory references

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitNot automatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

4.7MEDIUMjuniper
Attack Vector
LOCAL
Complexity
HIGH
Privileges
LOW
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
NONE
Integrity
NONE
Availability
HIGH
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusMODIFIED
CWE
CWE-908

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card