CVE-2023-28964

Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved: Malformed BGP flowspec update causes RPD crash

HIGH
7.5
CVSS Score
Published: April 17, 2023 at 12:00 AM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 05:49 AM UTC
3 products affected across 2 vendorsJunosJunos OS EvolvedJunos OS Evolved

Using Junos OS by Juniper Networks?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Junos OS - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
HIGH7.5
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.6%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

An Improper Handling of Length Parameter Inconsistency vulnerability in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows a network based, unauthenticated attacker to cause an RPD crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS). Continued receipt and processing of this packet will create a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition. Upon receipt of a malformed BGP flowspec update, RPD will crash resulting in a Denial of Service. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS: All versions prior to 18.1R3-S11; 18.2 versions prior to 18.2R3-S6; 18.3 versions prior to 18.3R3-S4; 18.4 versions prior to 18.4R3-S6; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R3-S4; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R3-S1; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R3-S1; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R3; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R2; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R2; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R1-S1, 20.3R2; Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved: All versions prior to 20.1R3-EVO; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R2-EVO; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R2-EVO;

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

v < 18.1v < 18.1R3-S1118.2 ≤ v < 18.2R3-S618.3 ≤ v < 18.3R3-S418.4 ≤ v < 18.4R3-S619.1 ≤ v < 19.1R3-S419.2 ≤ v < 19.2R3-S119.3 ≤ v < 19.3R3-S119.4 ≤ v < 19.4R320.1 ≤ v < 20.1R220.2 ≤ v < 20.2R220.3 ≤ v < 20.3R1-S1, 20.3R218.118.1 r18.1 r118.1 r218.1 r2-s118.1 r2-s218.1 r2-s418.1 r318.1 r3-s118.1 r3-s1018.1 r3-s218.1 r3-s318.1 r3-s418.1 r3-s518.1 r3-s618.1 r3-s718.1 r3-s818.1 r3-s918.1 r418.218.2 r18.2 r118.2 r1-s218.2 r1-s318.2 r1-s418.2 r1-s518.2 r218.2 r2-s118.2 r2-s218.2 r2-s318.2 r2-s418.2 r2-s518.2 r2-s618.2 r2-s718.2 r2-s818.2 r318.2 r3-s118.2 r3-s218.2 r3-s318.2 r3-s418.2 r3-s518.318.3 r18.3 r118.3 r1-s118.3 r1-s218.3 r1-s318.3 r1-s418.3 r1-s518.3 r1-s618.3 r218.3 r2-s118.3 r2-s218.3 r2-s318.3 r2-s418.3 r318.3 r3-s118.3 r3-s218.3 r3-s318.418.4 r118.4 r1-s118.4 r1-s218.4 r1-s318.4 r1-s418.4 r1-s518.4 r1-s618.4 r1-s718.4 r218.4 r2-s118.4 r2-s1018.4 r2-s218.4 r2-s318.4 r2-s418.4 r2-s518.4 r2-s618.4 r2-s718.4 r2-s818.4 r2-s918.4 r318.4 r3-s118.4 r3-s1018.4 r3-s1118.4 r3-s218.4 r3-s318.4 r3-s418.4 r3-s519.119.1 r119.1 r1-s119.1 r1-s219.1 r1-s319.1 r1-s419.1 r1-s519.1 r1-s619.1 r219.1 r2-s119.1 r2-s219.1 r2-s319.1 r319.1 r3-s119.1 r3-s219.1 r3-s319.219.2 r119.2 r1-s119.2 r1-s219.2 r1-s319.2 r1-s419.2 r1-s519.2 r1-s619.2 r1-s719.2 r1-s819.2 r1-s919.2 r219.2 r2-s119.2 r319.319.3 r119.3 r1-s119.3 r219.3 r2-s119.3 r2-s219.3 r2-s319.3 r2-s419.3 r2-s519.3 r2-s619.3 r2-s719.3 r319.419.4 r119.4 r1-s119.4 r1-s219.4 r1-s319.4 r1-s419.4 r219.4 r2-s119.4 r2-s219.4 r2-s319.4 r2-s419.4 r2-s519.4 r2-s619.4 r2-s720.120.1 r120.1 r1-s120.1 r1-s220.1 r1-s320.1 r1-s420.220.2 r120.2 r1-s120.2 r1-s220.2 r1-s320.320.3 r1
Affected range stops below 18.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 18.1R3-S11, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 18.2R3-S6, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 18.3R3-S4, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 18.4R3-S6, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 19.1R3-S4, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 19.2R3-S1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 19.3R3-S1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 19.4R3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 20.1R2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 20.2R2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 20.3R1-S1, 20.3R2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 20.1R3-EVO20.2 ≤ v < 20.2R2-EVO20.3 ≤ v < 20.3R2-EVO20.220.3
Affected range stops below 20.1R3-EVO, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 20.2R2-EVO, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 20.3R2-EVO, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

Patch and advisory references

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitAutomatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

7.5HIGHjuniper
Attack Vector
NETWORK
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
NONE
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
NONE
Integrity
NONE
Availability
HIGH
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusMODIFIED
CWE
CWE-130NVD-CWE-Other

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card