CVE-2023-22396

Junos OS: Receipt of crafted TCP packets destined to the device results in MBUF leak leading to a Denial of Service (DoS)

HIGH
7.5
CVSS Score
Published: January 12, 2023 at 12:00 AM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 05:35 AM UTC
1 product affected across 1 vendorJunos

Using Junos OS by Juniper Networks?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Junos OS - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
HIGH7.5
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.6%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

An Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in TCP processing on the Routing Engine (RE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an unauthenticated network-based attacker to send crafted TCP packets destined to the device, resulting in an MBUF leak that ultimately leads to a Denial of Service (DoS). The system does not recover automatically and must be manually restarted to restore service. This issue occurs when crafted TCP packets are sent directly to a configured IPv4 or IPv6 interface on the device. Transit traffic will not trigger this issue. MBUF usage can be monitored through the use of the 'show system buffers' command. For example: user@junos> show system buffers | refresh 5 4054/566/4620 mbufs in use (current/cache/total) ... 4089/531/4620 mbufs in use (current/cache/total) ... 4151/589/4740 mbufs in use (current/cache/total) ... 4213/527/4740 mbufs in use (current/cache/total) This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS: 12.3 version 12.3R12-S19 and later versions; 15.1 version 15.1R7-S10 and later versions; 17.3 version 17.3R3-S12 and later versions; 18.4 version 18.4R3-S9 and later versions; 19.1 version 19.1R3-S7 and later versions; 19.2 version 19.2R3-S3 and later versions; 19.3 version 19.3R2-S7, 19.3R3-S3 and later versions prior to 19.3R3-S7; 19.4 version 19.4R2-S7, 19.4R3-S5 and later versions prior to 19.4R3-S10; 20.1 version 20.1R3-S1 and later versions; 20.2 version 20.2R3-S2 and later versions prior to 20.2R3-S6; 20.3 version 20.3R3-S1 and later versions prior to 20.3R3-S6; 20.4 version 20.4R2-S2, 20.4R3 and later versions prior to 20.4R3-S5; 21.1 version 21.1R2 and later versions prior to 21.1R3-S4; 21.2 version 21.2R1-S1, 21.2R2 and later versions prior to 21.2R3-S3; 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R3-S2; 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R3; 22.1 versions prior to 22.1R2-S1, 22.1R3; 22.2 versions prior to 22.2R1-S2, 22.2R2; 22.3 versions prior to 22.3R1-S1, 22.3R2.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

Affected range stops below 12.3*, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 15.1*, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 17.3*, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 18.4*, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 19.1*, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 19.2*, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 19.3*, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 19.4*, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 20.1*, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 20.2*, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 20.3*, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 20.4*, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 21.1*, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 21.2*, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 21.3R3-S2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 21.4R3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 22.1R2-S1, 22.1R3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 22.2R1-S2, 22.2R2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 22.3R1-S1, 22.3R2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

Patch and advisory references

References (1)

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitNot automatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

7.5HIGHjuniper
Attack Vector
NETWORK
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
NONE
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
NONE
Integrity
NONE
Availability
HIGH
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusMODIFIED
CWE
CWE-400

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card