CVE-2022-48827

NFSD: Fix the behavior of READ near OFFSET_MAX

HIGH
7.1
CVSS Score
Published: July 16, 2024 at 11:44 AM UTC
Updated: October 14, 2026 at 07:16 PM UTC
2 products affected across 2 vendorsLinux KernelSIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP

Using Linux by Linux?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Linux - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
HIGH7.1
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.6%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: NFSD: Fix the behavior of READ near OFFSET_MAX Dan Aloni reports: > Due to commit 8cfb9015280d ("NFS: Always provide aligned buffers to > the RPC read layers") on the client, a read of 0xfff is aligned up > to server rsize of 0x1000. > > As a result, in a test where the server has a file of size > 0x7fffffffffffffff, and the client tries to read from the offset > 0x7ffffffffffff000, the read causes loff_t overflow in the server > and it returns an NFS code of EINVAL to the client. The client as > a result indefinitely retries the request. The Linux NFS client does not handle NFS?ERR_INVAL, even though all NFS specifications permit servers to return that status code for a READ. Instead of NFS?ERR_INVAL, have out-of-range READ requests succeed and return a short result. Set the EOF flag in the result to prevent the client from retrying the READ request. This behavior appears to be consistent with Solaris NFS servers. Note that NFSv3 and NFSv4 use u64 offset values on the wire. These must be converted to loff_t internally before use -- an implicit type cast is not adequate for this purpose. Otherwise VFS checks against sb->s_maxbytes do not work properly.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

v < 5.10.2205.11 ≤ v < 5.15.245.16 ≤ v < 5.16.101da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac25.175.17 rc15.17 rc25.17 rc3
Vendor states this is fixed in 0cb4d23ae08c48f6bf3c29a8e5c4a74b8388b960 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 1726a39b0879acfb490b22dca643f26f4f907da9 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 44502aca8e02ab32d6b0eb52e006a5ec9402719b (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in c6eff5c4277146a78b4fb8c9b668dd64542c41b0 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 2.6.12 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.10.220 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.15.24 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.16.10 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.17 (unaffected)

References (6)

Patch
Source: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0cb4d23ae08c48f6bf3c29a8e5c4a74b8388b960
Patch
Source: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1726a39b0879acfb490b22dca643f26f4f907da9
Patch
Source: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/44502aca8e02ab32d6b0eb52e006a5ec9402719b
Patch
Source: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c6eff5c4277146a78b4fb8c9b668dd64542c41b0
Source: 0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e
https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-265688.html
Source: 0b142b55-0307-4c5a-b3c9-f314f3fb7c5e
https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-355557.html

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitNot automatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

Attack Vector
LOCAL
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
LOW
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
HIGH
Integrity
NONE
Availability
HIGH
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusMODIFIED
CWE
CWE-125

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card