CVE-2022-3924

named configured to answer from stale cache may terminate unexpectedly at recursive-clients soft quota

HIGH
7.5
CVSS Score
Published: January 25, 2023 at 09:39 PM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 05:00 AM UTC
1 product affected across 1 vendorBIND

Using BIND 9 by ISC?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect BIND 9 - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
HIGH7.5
Exploit prediction
EPSS 16%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

This issue can affect BIND 9 resolvers with `stale-answer-enable yes;` that also make use of the option `stale-answer-client-timeout`, configured with a value greater than zero. If the resolver receives many queries that require recursion, there will be a corresponding increase in the number of clients that are waiting for recursion to complete. If there are sufficient clients already waiting when a new client query is received so that it is necessary to SERVFAIL the longest waiting client (see BIND 9 ARM `recursive-clients` limit and soft quota), then it is possible for a race to occur between providing a stale answer to this older client and sending an early timeout SERVFAIL, which may cause an assertion failure. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.16.12 through 9.16.36, 9.18.0 through 9.18.10, 9.19.0 through 9.19.8, and 9.16.12-S1 through 9.16.36-S1.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

9.16.12 ≤ v ≤ 9.16.369.16.12 ≤ v < 9.16.379.16.12-S1 ≤ v ≤ 9.16.36-S19.18.0 ≤ v ≤ 9.18.109.18.0 ≤ v < 9.18.119.19.0 ≤ v ≤ 9.19.89.19.0 ≤ v < 9.19.99.16.129.16.12 s19.16.12-S19.16.13 s19.16.14 s19.16.21 s19.16.32 s19.16.36 s19.18.09.19.0
Affected range stops below 9.16.37, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.18.11, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.19.9, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

Patch and advisory references

References (1)

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitAutomatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

7.5HIGHisc
Attack Vector
NETWORK
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
NONE
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
NONE
Integrity
NONE
Availability
HIGH
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusMODIFIED
CWE
CWE-617

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card