CVE-2022-33962

BIG-IP iRule vulnerability CVE-2022-33962

MEDIUM
6.7
CVSS Score
Published: August 4, 2022 at 05:46 PM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 04:49 AM UTC
12 products affected across 1 vendorBig IP Access Policy ManagerBig IP Application Security ManagerBig IP Advanced Firewall Manager

Using BIG-IP by F5?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect BIG-IP - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
MEDIUM6.7
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.2%

Description

In BIG-IP Versions 17.0.x before 17.0.0.1, 16.1.x before 16.1.3.1, 15.1.x before 15.1.6.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.5.1, and all versions of 13.1.x, certain iRules commands may allow an attacker to bypass the access control restrictions for a self IP address, regardless of the port lockdown settings. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

13.1.0 ≤ v ≤ 13.1.514.1.0 ≤ v < 14.1.5.115.1.0 ≤ v < 15.1.6.116.1.0 ≤ v < 16.1.3.117.0.0
Affected range stops below 14.1.5.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 15.1.6.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 16.1.3.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
13.1.0 ≤ v ≤ 13.1.514.1.0 ≤ v < 14.1.5.115.1.0 ≤ v < 15.1.6.116.1.0 ≤ v < 16.1.3.117.0.0
Affected range stops below 14.1.5.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 15.1.6.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 16.1.3.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
13.1.0 ≤ v ≤ 13.1.514.1.0 ≤ v < 14.1.5.115.1.0 ≤ v < 15.1.6.116.1.0 ≤ v < 16.1.3.117.0.0
Affected range stops below 14.1.5.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 15.1.6.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 16.1.3.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
13.1.0 ≤ v ≤ 13.1.514.1.0 ≤ v < 14.1.5.115.1.0 ≤ v < 15.1.6.116.1.0 ≤ v < 16.1.3.117.0.0
Affected range stops below 14.1.5.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 15.1.6.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 16.1.3.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
13.1.0 ≤ v ≤ 13.1.514.1.0 ≤ v < 14.1.5.115.1.0 ≤ v < 15.1.6.116.1.0 ≤ v < 16.1.3.117.0.0
Affected range stops below 14.1.5.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 15.1.6.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 16.1.3.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
13.1.0 ≤ v ≤ 13.1.514.1.0 ≤ v < 14.1.5.115.1.0 ≤ v < 15.1.6.116.1.0 ≤ v < 16.1.3.117.0.0
Affected range stops below 14.1.5.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 15.1.6.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 16.1.3.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
13.1.0 ≤ v ≤ 13.1.514.1.0 ≤ v < 14.1.5.115.1.0 ≤ v < 15.1.6.116.1.0 ≤ v < 16.1.3.117.0.0
Affected range stops below 14.1.5.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 15.1.6.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 16.1.3.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
13.1.0 ≤ v ≤ 13.1.514.1.0 ≤ v < 14.1.5.115.1.0 ≤ v < 15.1.6.116.1.0 ≤ v < 16.1.3.117.0.0
Affected range stops below 14.1.5.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 15.1.6.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 16.1.3.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
13.1.0 ≤ v ≤ 13.1.514.1.0 ≤ v < 14.1.5.115.1.0 ≤ v < 15.1.6.116.1.0 ≤ v < 16.1.3.117.0.0
Affected range stops below 14.1.5.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 15.1.6.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 16.1.3.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
13.1.0 ≤ v ≤ 13.1.514.1.0 ≤ v < 14.1.5.115.1.0 ≤ v < 15.1.6.116.1.0 ≤ v < 16.1.3.117.0.0
Affected range stops below 14.1.5.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 15.1.6.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 16.1.3.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

References (1)

CVSS

6.7MEDIUMf5
Attack Vector
LOCAL
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
HIGH
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
HIGH
Integrity
HIGH
Availability
HIGH
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusMODIFIED
CWE
CWE-269

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card