CVE-2022-33682

Disabled Hostname Verification makes Brokers, Proxies vulnerable to MITM attack

MEDIUM
5.9
CVSS Score
Published: September 23, 2022 at 09:25 AM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 04:49 AM UTC
1 product affected across 1 vendorPulsar

Using Apache Pulsar by Apache Software Foundation?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Apache Pulsar - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
MEDIUM5.9
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.7%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

TLS hostname verification cannot be enabled in the Pulsar Broker's Java Client, the Pulsar Broker's Java Admin Client, the Pulsar WebSocket Proxy's Java Client, and the Pulsar Proxy's Admin Client leaving intra-cluster connections and geo-replication connections vulnerable to man in the middle attacks, which could leak credentials, configuration data, message data, and any other data sent by these clients. The vulnerability is for both the pulsar+ssl protocol and HTTPS. An attacker can only take advantage of this vulnerability by taking control of a machine 'between' the client and the server. The attacker must then actively manipulate traffic to perform the attack by providing the client with a cryptographically valid certificate for an unrelated host. This issue affects Apache Pulsar Broker, Proxy, and WebSocket Proxy versions 2.7.0 to 2.7.4; 2.8.0 to 2.8.3; 2.9.0 to 2.9.2; 2.10.0; 2.6.4 and earlier.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

v < 2.7.52.6 and earlier ≤ v ≤ 2.6.42.7 ≤ v ≤ 2.7.42.8 ≤ v ≤ 2.8.32.8.0 ≤ v < 2.8.42.9 ≤ v ≤ 2.9.22.9.0 ≤ v < 2.9.32.10.02.72.82.9
Affected range stops below 2.7.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 2.8.4, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 2.9.3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

References (1)

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitNot automatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

5.9MEDIUMCISA-ADP
Attack Vector
NETWORK
Complexity
HIGH
Privileges
NONE
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
HIGH
Integrity
NONE
Availability
NONE
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusMODIFIED
CWE
CWE-295

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card