CVE-2021-47455

ptp: Fix possible memory leak in ptp_clock_register()

MEDIUM
5.5
CVSS Score
Published: May 22, 2024 at 06:19 AM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 04:17 AM UTC
1 product affected across 1 vendorLinux Kernel

Using Linux by Linux?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Linux - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
MEDIUM5.5
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.2%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ptp: Fix possible memory leak in ptp_clock_register() I got memory leak as follows when doing fault injection test: unreferenced object 0xffff88800906c618 (size 8): comm "i2c-idt82p33931", pid 4421, jiffies 4294948083 (age 13.188s) hex dump (first 8 bytes): 70 74 70 30 00 00 00 00 ptp0.... backtrace: [<00000000312ed458>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x19f/0x3a0 [<0000000079f6e2ff>] kvasprintf+0xb5/0x150 [<0000000026aae54f>] kvasprintf_const+0x60/0x190 [<00000000f323a5f7>] kobject_set_name_vargs+0x56/0x150 [<000000004e35abdd>] dev_set_name+0xc0/0x100 [<00000000f20cfe25>] ptp_clock_register+0x9f4/0xd30 [ptp] [<000000008bb9f0de>] idt82p33_probe.cold+0x8b6/0x1561 [ptp_idt82p33] When posix_clock_register() returns an error, the name allocated in dev_set_name() will be leaked, the put_device() should be used to give up the device reference, then the name will be freed in kobject_cleanup() and other memory will be freed in ptp_clock_release().

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

v ≥ 3.16.83v ≥ 4.14.162v ≥ 4.19.93v ≥ 4.4.224v ≥ 4.9.224v ≥ 5.4.83.16.83 ≤ v < 3.174.14.162 ≤ v < 4.154.19.93 ≤ v < 4.204.4.224 ≤ v < 4.54.9.224 ≤ v < 4.105.4.8 ≤ v < 5.14.155.4.8 ≤ v < 5.55.5 ≤ v < 5.10.2415.5 ≤ v < 5.14.155.5 ≤ v < 5.152dece4d6d13fe179ee3a5991811712725a56e2f73.16.83393b8720128d5b39db8523e5bfbfc689f18c37c4.14.1624.19.934.4.2244.9.2245.15 rc15.15 rc25.15 rc35.15 rc45.15 rc55.15 rc65.4.85230ef61882d2d14deb846eb6b48370694816e4c6f5e3bb7879ee1eb71c6c3cbaaffbb0da6cd7d5789e8fc989feaac00bf1a7f9a766289422e2f5768a33121e5487b424339636b25c35d3a180eaa5f5ebfa2e0cd3dfda64fde43c3dca3aeba298d2fe7ad
Vendor states this is fixed in 4225fea1cb28370086e17e82c0f69bec2779dca0 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in 95c0a0c5ec8839f8f21672be786e87a100319ca8 (fixed)
Vendor states this is fixed in f1c96d8085588e1b997a96214b409ac3be20b524 (fixed)
Affected range stops below 3.17, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 4.10, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 4.15, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 4.20, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 4.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.10.241 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.14.15 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.15 (unaffected)
Vendor states this is fixed in 5.5 (unaffected)

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

References (4)

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitNot automatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

Attack Vector
LOCAL
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
LOW
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
NONE
Integrity
NONE
Availability
HIGH
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusMODIFIED
CWE
CWE-401

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card