CVE-2021-44533

MEDIUM
5.3
CVSS Score
Published: February 24, 2022 at 06:27 PM UTC
Updated: October 8, 2026 at 10:17 PM UTC
9 products affected across 3 vendorsDebian LinuxMySQL ServerPeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools

Using Node by NodeJS?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Node - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
MEDIUM5.3
Exploit prediction
EPSS 9%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 did not handle multi-value Relative Distinguished Names correctly. Attackers could craft certificate subjects containing a single-value Relative Distinguished Name that would be interpreted as a multi-value Relative Distinguished Name, for example, in order to inject a Common Name that would allow bypassing the certificate subject verification.Affected versions of Node.js that do not accept multi-value Relative Distinguished Names and are thus not vulnerable to such attacks themselves. However, third-party code that uses node's ambiguous presentation of certificate subjects may be vulnerable.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

v < 12.22.914.0.0 ≤ v < 14.18.316.0.0 ≤ v < 16.13.217.0.0 ≤ v < 17.3.1*10.011.012.013.014.015.016.017.04.05.06.07.08.09.0
Affected range stops below 10.*, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 11.*, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 12.22.9, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 13.*, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 14.18.3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 15.*, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 16.13.2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 17.3.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 4.*, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 5.*, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 6.*, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.*, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 8.*, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.*, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 8.0.29*8.0.29
Affected range stops below 8.0.29, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v ≤ 8.0.29*
v ≤ 5.7.378.0.0 ≤ v ≤ 8.0.28*
v ≤ 8.0.28*

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

References (6)

x_refsource_MISCExploitMitigationThird Party Advisory
https://hackerone.com/reports/1429694
Vendor Advisoryx_refsource_DEBIANThird Party Advisory
https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5170
x_refsource_MISCPatchThird Party Advisory
https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitAutomatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

Attack Vector
NETWORK
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
NONE
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
NONE
Integrity
LOW
Availability
NONE
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusMODIFIED
CWE
CWE-295

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card