CVE-2021-43072

MEDIUM
6.7
CVSS Score
Published: July 18, 2023 at 12:01 AM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 04:10 AM UTC
4 products affected across 1 vendorFortiOSFortiProxyFortiManager

Using FortiAnalyzer by Fortinet?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect FortiAnalyzer - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
MEDIUM6.7
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.2%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

A buffer copy without checking size of input ('classic buffer overflow') in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer version 7.0.2 and below, version 6.4.7 and below, version 6.2.9 and below, version 6.0.11 and below, version 5.6.11 and below, FortiManager version 7.0.2 and below, version 6.4.7 and below, version 6.2.9 and below, version 6.0.11 and below, version 5.6.11 and below, FortiOS version 7.0.0 through 7.0.4, 6.4.0 through 6.4.8, 6.2.0 through 6.2.10, 6.0.x and FortiProxy version 7.0.0 through 7.0.3, 2.0.0 through 2.0.8, 1.2.x, 1.1.x and 1.0.x allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted CLI `execute restore image` and `execute certificate remote` operations with the tFTP protocol.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

Affected range stops below 6.4.8, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.0.3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 6.4.8, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.0.3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
6.0.0 ≤ v < 6.2.116.4.0 ≤ v < 6.4.97.0.0 ≤ v < 7.0.6
Affected range stops below 6.2.11, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 6.4.9, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.0.6, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
1.0.0 ≤ v < 2.0.97.0.0 ≤ v < 7.0.4
Affected range stops below 2.0.9, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.0.4, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitNot automatableTotal impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

Attack Vector
LOCAL
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
HIGH
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
HIGH
Integrity
HIGH
Availability
HIGH
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusMODIFIED
CWE
CWE-120

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card