CVE-2021-34753

Cisco Firepower Threat Defense Ethernet Industrial Protocol Policy Bypass Vulnerabilities

MEDIUM
5.3
CVSS Score
Published: November 15, 2024 at 04:14 PM UTC
Updated: August 11, 2026 at 07:40 PM UTC
2 products affected across 1 vendorSecure Firewall Threat DefenseFirepower Threat Defense

Using Cisco Firepower Threat Defense Software by Cisco?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Cisco Firepower Threat Defense Software - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
MEDIUM5.3
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.7%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

A vulnerability in the payload inspection for Ethernet Industrial Protocol (ENIP) traffic for Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass configured rules for ENIP traffic. This vulnerability is due to incomplete processing during deep packet inspection for ENIP packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted ENIP packet to the targeted interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass configured access control and intrusion policies that should trigger and drop for the ENIP packet.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

v < 6.4.0.136.5.0 ≤ v < 6.6.5.16.7.0 ≤ v < 6.7.0.37.0.0
Affected range stops below 6.4.0.13, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 6.6.5.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 6.7.0.3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 6.4.0.136.5.0 ≤ v < 6.6.5.16.7.0 ≤ v < 6.7.0.37.0.0 ≤ v < 7.0.16.5.06.7.07.0.0
Affected range stops below 6.4.0.13, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 6.6.5.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 6.7.0.3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.0.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitAutomatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

Attack Vector
NETWORK
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
NONE
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
NONE
Integrity
LOW
Availability
NONE
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusANALYZED
CWE
CWE-284

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card