CVE-2021-28165
HIGH
7.5
CVSS Score
Published: April 1, 2021 at 02:20 PM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 03:45 AM UTC
21 products affected across 4 vendorsSnapCenterJenkinsE Series Santricity OS Controller
Using Eclipse Jetty by The Eclipse Foundation?
Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Eclipse Jetty - before attackers find them.
Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
HIGH7.5
Exploit prediction
EPSS 54%
SSVC
No known exploit
Description
In Eclipse Jetty 7.2.2 to 9.4.38, 10.0.0.alpha0 to 10.0.1, and 11.0.0.alpha0 to 11.0.1, CPU usage can reach 100% upon receiving a large invalid TLS frame.
Affected
Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.
v ≥ 10.0.0.alpha0v ≥ 11.0.0.alpha0v ≥ 7.2.2v ≤ 10.0.1v ≤ 11.0.1v ≤ 9.4.3810.0.0 ≤ v < 10.0.211.0.0 ≤ v < 11.0.27.2.2 ≤ v < 9.4.3910.0.0.alpha011.0.0.alpha07.2.2
Affected range stops below 10.0.2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 11.0.2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.4.39, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 2.277.3v < 2.286
Affected range stops below 2.277.3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 2.286, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 3.9.8
Affected range stops below 3.9.8, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 3.0
Affected range stops below 3.0, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
11.0.0 ≤ v < 11.70.1
Affected range stops below 11.70.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 1.10
Affected range stops below 1.10, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 5.1
Affected range stops below 5.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 9.10
Affected range stops below 9.10, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
All versions
v < 5.1
Affected range stops below 5.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Remediation
No guide yetNo remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:
References (107)
Mailing Listx_refsource_MLISTThird Party Advisory
Source: [email protected]
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/04/20/3x_refsource_CONFIRMExploitThird Party Advisory
Source: [email protected]
https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/security/advisories/GHSA-26vr-8j45-3r4wMailing Listx_refsource_MLIST
Source: [email protected]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r03ca0b69db1e3e5f72fe484b71370d537cd711cbf334e2913332730a%40%3Cissues.spark.apache.org%3EMailing Listx_refsource_MLIST
Source: [email protected]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r05db8e0ef01e1280cc7543575ae0fa1c2b4d06a8b928916ef65dd2ad%40%3Creviews.spark.apache.org%3EMailing Listx_refsource_MLIST
Source: [email protected]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r06d54a297cb8217c66e5190912a955fb870ba47da164002bf2baffe5%40%3Creviews.spark.apache.org%3EMailing Listx_refsource_MLIST
Source: [email protected]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r077b76cafb61520c14c87c4fc76419ed664002da0ddac5ad851ae7e7%40%3Cjira.kafka.apache.org%3EMailing Listx_refsource_MLIST
Source: [email protected]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r0841b06b48324cfc81325de3c05a92e53f997185f9d71ff47734d961%40%3Cissues.solr.apache.org%3ESSVC — Action Prioritization
SSVCNo known exploitAutomatablePartial impact
SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.
CVSS
7.5HIGHeclipse
- Attack Vector
- NETWORK
- Complexity
- LOW
- Privileges
- NONE
- User Interaction
- NONE
- Scope
- UNCHANGED
- Confidentiality
- NONE
- Integrity
- NONE
- Availability
- HIGH
Vector?
Quick Info
StatusMODIFIED
CWE
CWE-400CWE-551CWE-755
Get alerted
Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack
Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.
Free plan, no card