CVE-2021-0221

Junos OS: QFX Series: Traffic loop Denial of Service (DoS) upon receipt of specific IP multicast traffic

MEDIUM

6.5

CVSS Score

Published: January 15, 2021 at 05:36 PM UTC

Updated: June 17, 2026 at 03:29 AM UTC

1 product affected across 1 vendorJunos

Using Junos OS by Juniper Networks?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Junos OS - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available

Start Free Sign In

Severity

MEDIUM6.5

Exploit prediction

EPSS 0.5%

Description

In an EVPN/VXLAN scenario, if an IRB interface with a virtual gateway address (VGA) is configured on a PE, a traffic loop may occur upon receipt of specific IP multicast traffic. The traffic loop will cause interface traffic to increase abnormally, ultimately leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) in packet processing. The following command could be used to monitor the interface traffic: user@junos> monitor interface traffic Interface Link Input packets (pps) Output packets (pps) et-0/0/1 Up 6492089274364 (70994959) 6492089235319 (70994956) et-0/0/25 Up 343458103 (1) 156844 (0) ae0 Up 9132519197257 (70994959) 9132519139454 (70994956) This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS on QFX Series: all versions prior to 17.3R3-S10; 17.4 versions prior to 17.4R2-S12, 17.4R3-S3; 18.1 versions prior to 18.1R3-S11; 18.2 versions prior to 18.2R3-S6; 18.3 versions prior to 18.3R3-S4; 18.4 versions prior to 18.4R2-S5, 18.4R3-S5; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R1-S6, 19.1R2-S2, 19.1R3-S3; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R1-S5, 19.2R3-S1; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R2-S5, 19.3R3; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R2-S2, 19.4R3; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R2; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R1-S2, 20.2R2.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

Junos · Juniper Networks

95%

v < 17.3R3-S1017.4 ≤ v < 17.4R2-S12, 17.4R3-S318.1 ≤ v < 18.1R3-S1118.2 ≤ v < 18.2R3-S618.3 ≤ v < 18.3R3-S418.4 ≤ v < 18.4R2-S5, 18.4R3-S519.1 ≤ v < 19.1R1-S6, 19.1R2-S2, 19.1R3-S319.2 ≤ v < 19.2R1-S5, 19.2R3-S119.3 ≤ v < 19.3R2-S5, 19.3R319.4 ≤ v < 19.4R2-S2, 19.4R320.1 ≤ v < 20.1R220.2 ≤ v < 20.2R1-S2, 20.2R217.3 17.3 r1-s1 17.3 r2 17.3 r2-s1 17.3 r2-s2 17.3 r2-s3 17.3 r2-s4 17.3 r2-s5 17.3 r3 17.3 r3-s1 17.3 r3-s2 17.3 r3-s3 17.3 r3-s4 17.3 r3-s7 17.3 r3-s8 17.3 r3-s9 17.4 17.4 r1 17.4 r1-s1 17.4 r1-s2 17.4 r1-s4 17.4 r1-s5 17.4 r1-s6 17.4 r1-s7 17.4 r2 17.4 r2-s1 17.4 r2-s10 17.4 r2-s11 17.4 r2-s2 17.4 r2-s3 17.4 r2-s4 17.4 r2-s5 17.4 r2-s6 17.4 r2-s7 17.4 r2-s8 17.4 r2-s9 17.4 r3 17.4 r3-s1 17.4 r3-s2 18.1 18.1 r1 18.1 r2 18.1 r2-s1 18.1 r2-s2 18.1 r2-s4 18.1 r3 18.1 r3-s1 18.1 r3-s10 18.1 r3-s2 18.1 r3-s3 18.1 r3-s4 18.1 r3-s6 18.1 r3-s7 18.1 r3-s8 18.1 r3-s9 18.2 18.2 r1 18.2 r1-s3 18.2 r1-s4 18.2 r1-s5 18.2 r2 18.2 r2-s1 18.2 r2-s2 18.2 r2-s3 18.2 r2-s4 18.2 r2-s5 18.2 r2-s6 18.2 r3 18.2 r3-s1 18.2 r3-s2 18.2 r3-s3 18.2 r3-s4 18.2 r3-s5 18.3 18.3 r1 18.3 r1-s1 18.3 r1-s2 18.3 r1-s3 18.3 r1-s5 18.3 r1-s6 18.3 r2 18.3 r2-s1 18.3 r2-s2 18.3 r2-s3 18.3 r2-s4 18.3 r3 18.3 r3-s1 18.3 r3-s2 18.3 r3-s3 18.4 18.4 r1 18.4 r1-s1 18.4 r1-s2 18.4 r1-s5 18.4 r1-s6 18.4 r2 18.4 r2-s1 18.4 r2-s2 18.4 r2-s3 18.4 r2-s4 18.4 r3 18.4 r3-s1 18.4 r3-s2 18.4 r3-s3 18.4 r3-s4 19.1 19.1 r1 19.1 r1-s1 19.1 r1-s2 19.1 r1-s3 19.1 r1-s4 19.1 r1-s5 19.1 r2 19.1 r2-s1 19.1 r3 19.1 r3-s1 19.1 r3-s2 19.2 19.2 r1 19.2 r1-s1 19.2 r1-s2 19.2 r1-s3 19.2 r1-s4 19.2 r2 19.2 r3 19.3 19.3 r1 19.3 r1-s1 19.3 r2 19.3 r2-s1 19.3 r2-s2 19.3 r2-s3 19.3 r2-s4 19.4 19.4 r1 19.4 r1-s1 19.4 r1-s2 19.4 r2 19.4 r2-s1 20.1 20.1 r1 20.1 r1-s1 20.1 r1-s2 20.1 r1-s3 20.2 20.2 r1 20.2 r1-s1

Affected range stops below 17.3R3-S10, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Affected range stops below 17.4R2-S12, 17.4R3-S3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Affected range stops below 18.1R3-S11, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Affected range stops below 18.2R3-S6, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Affected range stops below 18.3R3-S4, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Affected range stops below 18.4R2-S5, 18.4R3-S5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Affected range stops below 19.1R1-S6, 19.1R2-S2, 19.1R3-S3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Affected range stops below 19.2R1-S5, 19.2R3-S1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Affected range stops below 19.3R2-S5, 19.3R3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Affected range stops below 19.4R2-S2, 19.4R3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Affected range stops below 20.1R2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Affected range stops below 20.2R1-S2, 20.2R2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

Patch and advisory references

https://kb.juniper.net/JSA11111

References (1)

x_refsource_CONFIRMVendor Advisory

Source: [email protected]

https://kb.juniper.net/JSA11111

CVSS

6.5MEDIUMjuniper

Attack Vector: ADJACENT_NETWORK
Complexity: LOW
Privileges: NONE
User Interaction: NONE
Scope: UNCHANGED
Confidentiality: NONE
Integrity: NONE
Availability: HIGH

Vector?

Quick Info

StatusMODIFIED

CWE

CWE-703CWE-835

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Create account Sign in

Free plan, no card