CVE-2020-3578

Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software and Firepower Threat Defense Software WebVPN Portal Access Rule Bypass Vulnerability

MEDIUM
6.5
CVSS Score
Published: October 21, 2020 at 06:40 PM UTC
Updated: August 11, 2026 at 07:42 PM UTC
3 products affected across 1 vendorAdaptive Security ApplianceSecure Firewall Threat DefenseFirepower Threat Defense

Using Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software by Cisco?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
MEDIUM6.5
Exploit prediction
EPSS 1%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

A vulnerability in the web services interface of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass a configured access rule and access parts of the WebVPN portal that are supposed to be blocked. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of URLs when portal access rules are configured. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by accessing certain URLs on the affected device.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

v < 9.6.4.459.10 ≤ v < 9.10.1.449.12 ≤ v < 9.12.4.49.13 ≤ v < 9.13.1.139.14 ≤ v < 9.14.1.199.7 ≤ v < 9.8.4.269.9 ≤ v < 9.9.2.80
Affected range stops below 9.10.1.44, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.12.4.4, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.13.1.13, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.14.1.19, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.6.4.45, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.8.4.26, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.9.2.80, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 6.3.0.66.5.0 ≤ v < 6.5.0.56.6.0 ≤ v < 6.6.1
Affected range stops below 6.3.0.6, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 6.5.0.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 6.6.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
6.4.0 ≤ v < 6.4.0.10
Affected range stops below 6.4.0.10, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitAutomatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

Attack Vector
NETWORK
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
NONE
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
LOW
Integrity
LOW
Availability
NONE
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusMODIFIED
CWE
CWE-863

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card