CVE-2020-27727

MEDIUM
4.9
CVSS Score
Published: December 24, 2020 at 03:03 PM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 03:09 AM UTC
12 products affected across 1 vendorBig IP Access Policy ManagerBig IP Application Security ManagerBig IP Advanced Firewall Manager

Using BIG-IP by N/A?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect BIG-IP - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
MEDIUM4.9
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.9%

Description

On BIG-IP version 16.0.0-16.0.0.1, 15.1.0-15.1.0.5, 14.1.0-14.1.3, and 13.1.0-13.1.3.4, when an authenticated administrative user installs RPMs using the iAppsLX REST installer, the BIG-IP system does not sufficiently validate user input, allowing the user read access to the filesystem.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

13.1.0 ≤ v < 13.1.3.514.1.0 ≤ v < 14.1.3.115.0.0 ≤ v < 15.1.116.0.0 ≤ v < 16.0.1.1
Affected range stops below 13.1.3.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 14.1.3.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 15.1.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 16.0.1.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
13.1.0 ≤ v < 13.1.3.514.1.0 ≤ v < 14.1.3.115.0.0 ≤ v < 15.1.116.0.0 ≤ v < 16.0.1.1
Affected range stops below 13.1.3.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 14.1.3.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 15.1.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 16.0.1.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
13.1.0 ≤ v < 13.1.3.514.1.0 ≤ v < 14.1.3.115.0.0 ≤ v < 15.1.116.0.0 ≤ v < 16.0.1.1
Affected range stops below 13.1.3.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 14.1.3.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 15.1.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 16.0.1.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
13.1.0 ≤ v < 13.1.3.514.1.0 ≤ v < 14.1.3.115.0.0 ≤ v < 15.1.116.0.0 ≤ v < 16.0.1.1
Affected range stops below 13.1.3.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 14.1.3.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 15.1.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 16.0.1.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
13.1.0 ≤ v < 13.1.3.514.1.0 ≤ v < 14.1.3.115.0.0 ≤ v < 15.1.116.0.0 ≤ v < 16.0.1.1
Affected range stops below 13.1.3.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 14.1.3.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 15.1.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 16.0.1.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
13.1.0 ≤ v < 13.1.3.514.1.0 ≤ v < 14.1.3.115.0.0 ≤ v < 15.1.116.0.0 ≤ v < 16.0.1.1
Affected range stops below 13.1.3.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 14.1.3.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 15.1.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 16.0.1.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
13.1.0 ≤ v < 13.1.3.514.1.0 ≤ v < 14.1.3.115.0.0 ≤ v < 15.1.116.0.0 ≤ v < 16.0.1.1
Affected range stops below 13.1.3.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 14.1.3.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 15.1.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 16.0.1.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
13.1.0 ≤ v < 13.1.3.514.1.0 ≤ v < 14.1.3.115.0.0 ≤ v < 15.1.116.0.0 ≤ v < 16.0.1.1
Affected range stops below 13.1.3.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 14.1.3.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 15.1.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 16.0.1.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
13.1.0 ≤ v < 13.1.3.514.1.0 ≤ v < 14.1.3.115.0.0 ≤ v < 15.1.116.0.0 ≤ v < 16.0.1.1
Affected range stops below 13.1.3.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 14.1.3.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 15.1.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 16.0.1.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
13.1.0 ≤ v < 13.1.3.514.1.0 ≤ v < 14.1.3.115.0.0 ≤ v < 15.1.116.0.0 ≤ v < 16.0.1.1
Affected range stops below 13.1.3.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 14.1.3.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 15.1.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 16.0.1.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

References (1)

CVSS

Attack Vector
NETWORK
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
HIGH
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
HIGH
Integrity
NONE
Availability
NONE
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusMODIFIED
CWE
CWE-20

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card