CVE-2020-1785
MEDIUM
5.5
CVSS Score
Published: January 3, 2020 at 02:45 PM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 03:02 AM UTC
8 products affected across 1 vendorHonor V10 FirmwareMate 10 Pro FirmwareNova 4 Firmware
Using Mate 10 Pro;Honor V10;Honor 10;Nova 4 by N/A?
Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Mate 10 Pro;Honor V10;Honor 10;Nova 4 - before attackers find them.
Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
MEDIUM5.5
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.5%
Description
Mate 10 Pro;Honor V10;Honor 10;Nova 4 smartphones have a denial of service vulnerability. The system does not properly check the status of certain module during certain operations, an attacker should trick the user into installing a malicious application, successful exploit could cause reboot of the smartphone.
Affected
Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.
v < 9.1.0.350(c10e5r1p14t8)v < 9.1.0.350(c185e3r1p12t8)v < 9.1.0.350(c461e3r1p11t8)v < 9.1.0.350(c636e3r1p13t8)v < 9.1.0.351(c432e5r1p13t8)
Affected range stops below 9.1.0.350(c10e5r1p14t8), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.1.0.350(c185e3r1p12t8), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.1.0.350(c461e3r1p11t8), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.1.0.350(c636e3r1p13t8), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.1.0.351(c432e5r1p13t8), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
huawei-honor-10 (same device)
v < 9.1.0.333(c00e333r2p1t8)v < 9.1.0.350(c636e4r1p13t8)v < 9.1.0.351(c432e5r1p13t8)
Affected range stops below 9.1.0.333(c00e333r2p1t8), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.1.0.350(c636e4r1p13t8), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.1.0.351(c432e5r1p13t8), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
huawei-honor-v10 (same device)
v < 9.1.0.321(c605e4r1p13t8)v < 9.1.0.321(c636e4r1p14t8)v < 9.1.0.330(c432e6r1p12t8)
Affected range stops below 9.1.0.321(c605e4r1p13t8), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.1.0.321(c636e4r1p14t8), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.1.0.330(c432e6r1p12t8), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
huawei-mate-10-pro (same device)
v < 9.1.0.225(c636e1r4p1)
Affected range stops below 9.1.0.225(c636e1r4p1), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
huawei-nova-4 (same device)
v < 9.1.0.225v < 9.1.0.321v < 9.1.0.330v < 9.1.0.333v < 9.1.0.350v < 9.1.0.351
Affected range stops below 9.1.0.225, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.1.0.321, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.1.0.330, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.1.0.333, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.1.0.350, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.1.0.351, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 9.1.0.225v < 9.1.0.321v < 9.1.0.330v < 9.1.0.333v < 9.1.0.350v < 9.1.0.351
Affected range stops below 9.1.0.225, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.1.0.321, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.1.0.330, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.1.0.333, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.1.0.350, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.1.0.351, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 9.1.0.225v < 9.1.0.321v < 9.1.0.330v < 9.1.0.333v < 9.1.0.350v < 9.1.0.351
Affected range stops below 9.1.0.225, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.1.0.321, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.1.0.330, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.1.0.333, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.1.0.350, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.1.0.351, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 9.1.0.225v < 9.1.0.321v < 9.1.0.330v < 9.1.0.333v < 9.1.0.350v < 9.1.0.351
Affected range stops below 9.1.0.225, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.1.0.321, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.1.0.330, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.1.0.333, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.1.0.350, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.1.0.351, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Remediation
No guide yetNo remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:
Patch and advisory references
References (1)
x_refsource_MISCVendor Advisory
Source: [email protected]
https://www.huawei.com/en/psirt/security-advisories/huawei-sa-20200102-03-smartphone-enCVSS
- Attack Vector
- LOCAL
- Complexity
- LOW
- Privileges
- NONE
- User Interaction
- REQUIRED
- Scope
- UNCHANGED
- Confidentiality
- NONE
- Integrity
- NONE
- Availability
- HIGH
Vector?
Quick Info
StatusMODIFIED
CWE
NVD-CWE-noinfo
Get alerted
Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack
Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.
Free plan, no card