CVE-2020-15415

CRITICAL
9.8
CVSS Score
Published: June 30, 2020 at 01:37 PM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 02:56 AM UTC
6 products affected across 1 vendorVIGOR3900 FirmwareVIGOR2960 FirmwareVIGOR300B Firmware

Using N/A by N/A?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect N/A - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
CRITICAL9.8
Exploitation
CISA KEV
Exploit prediction
EPSS 84%
SSVC
Active

Actively Exploited

CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) Catalog

EPSS Score84.5%

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) estimates a 84.5% chance this CVE is exploited in the wild within the next 30 days — higher than 100% of all CVEs. It complements CVSS: a high EPSS on a mid-severity CVE can still be urgent.

DrayTek Vigor3900, Vigor2960, and Vigor300B devices contain an OS command injection vulnerability in cgi-bin/mainfunction.cgi/cvmcfgupload that allows for remote code execution via shell metacharacters in a filename when the text/x-python-script content type is used.

Required Action
Apply mitigations per vendor instructions or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.
Ransomware Use
Unknown
Added to KEV
Sep 30, 2024
Remediation Due
Oct 21, 2024
738 days overdue

Description

On DrayTek Vigor3900, Vigor2960, and Vigor300B devices before 1.5.1, cgi-bin/mainfunction.cgi/cvmcfgupload allows remote command execution via shell metacharacters in a filename when the text/x-python-script content type is used, a different issue than CVE-2020-14472.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

v < 1.5.1
Affected range stops below 1.5.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
draytek-vigor2960 (same device)
v < 1.5.1
Affected range stops below 1.5.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 1.5.1
Affected range stops below 1.5.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 1.5.1
Affected range stops below 1.5.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
All versions
All versions

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

References (3)

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCActiveAutomatableTotal impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

9.8CRITICALCISA-ADP
Attack Vector
NETWORK
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
NONE
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
HIGH
Integrity
HIGH
Availability
HIGH
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusANALYZED
CWE
CWE-78

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card