CVE-2019-9511

Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service

HIGH
7.5
CVSS Score
Published: August 13, 2019 at 08:50 PM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 02:43 AM UTC
22 products affected across 12 vendorsDebian LinuxFedoraUbuntu Linux

Using N/A by N/A?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect N/A - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
HIGH7.5
Exploit prediction
EPSS 60%

Description

Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

6.0.0 ≤ v ≤ 6.2.37.0.0 ≤ v ≤ 7.1.68.0.0 ≤ v ≤ 8.0.3
1.0.0 ≤ v ≤ 1.4.0
apple-macos (environment) · canonical-ubuntu-linux (environment)
1.17.0 ≤ v ≤ 1.17.21.9.5 ≤ v < 1.16.1
Affected range stops below 1.16.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
7.7.2.0 ≤ v < 7.7.2.247.8.2.0 ≤ v < 7.8.2.138.1.0 ≤ v < 8.2.0
Affected range stops below 7.7.2.24, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.8.2.13, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 8.2.0, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
10.0.0 ≤ v ≤ 10.12.010.13.0 ≤ v < 10.16.312.0.0 ≤ v < 12.8.18.0.0 ≤ v ≤ 8.8.18.9.0 ≤ v < 8.16.1
Affected range stops below 10.16.3, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 12.8.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 8.16.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

References (47)

Vendor Advisoryx_refsource_SUSEMailing ListThird Party Advisory
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html
Vendor Advisoryx_refsource_SUSEMailing ListThird Party Advisory
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00032.html
Vendor Advisoryx_refsource_SUSEMailing ListThird Party Advisory
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00035.html
Vendor Advisoryx_refsource_SUSEMailing ListThird Party Advisory
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00003.html
Vendor Advisoryx_refsource_SUSEMailing ListThird Party Advisory
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00005.html
Vendor Advisoryx_refsource_SUSEMailing ListThird Party Advisory
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00014.html
Vendor Advisoryx_refsource_REDHATThird Party Advisory
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2692
Vendor Advisoryx_refsource_REDHATThird Party Advisory
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2745

CVSS

Attack Vector
NETWORK
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
NONE
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
NONE
Integrity
NONE
Availability
HIGH
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusMODIFIED
CWE
CWE-400CWE-770

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card