CVE-2019-6634
N/A
Published: July 3, 2019 at 06:12 PM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 02:39 AM UTC
14 products affected across 1 vendorBig IP Access Policy ManagerBig IP Application Security ManagerBig IP Advanced Firewall Manager
Using BIG-IP by F5?
Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect BIG-IP - before attackers find them.
Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
N/A
Exploit prediction
EPSS 1%
Description
On BIG-IP 14.1.0-14.1.0.5, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.0.0-13.1.1.4, and 12.1.0-12.1.4, a high volume of malformed analytics report requests leads to instability in restjavad process. This causes issues with both iControl REST and some portions of TMUI. The attack requires an authenticated user with any role.
Affected
Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.
12.1.0 ≤ v < 12.1.4.113.0.0 ≤ v < 13.1.1.514.0.0 ≤ v < 14.0.0.514.1.0 ≤ v < 14.1.0.6
Affected range stops below 12.1.4.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 13.1.1.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 14.0.0.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 14.1.0.6, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
12.1.0 ≤ v < 12.1.4.113.0.0 ≤ v < 13.1.1.514.0.0 ≤ v < 14.0.0.514.1.0 ≤ v < 14.1.0.6
Affected range stops below 12.1.4.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 13.1.1.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 14.0.0.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 14.1.0.6, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
12.1.0 ≤ v < 12.1.4.113.0.0 ≤ v < 13.1.1.514.0.0 ≤ v < 14.0.0.514.1.0 ≤ v < 14.1.0.6
Affected range stops below 12.1.4.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 13.1.1.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 14.0.0.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 14.1.0.6, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
12.1.0 ≤ v < 12.1.4.113.0.0 ≤ v < 13.1.1.514.0.0 ≤ v < 14.0.0.514.1.0 ≤ v < 14.1.0.6
Affected range stops below 12.1.4.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 13.1.1.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 14.0.0.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 14.1.0.6, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
12.1.0 ≤ v < 12.1.4.113.0.0 ≤ v < 13.1.1.514.0.0 ≤ v < 14.0.0.514.1.0 ≤ v < 14.1.0.6
Affected range stops below 12.1.4.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 13.1.1.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 14.0.0.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 14.1.0.6, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
12.1.0 ≤ v < 12.1.4.113.0.0 ≤ v < 13.1.1.514.0.0 ≤ v < 14.0.0.514.1.0 ≤ v < 14.1.0.6
Affected range stops below 12.1.4.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 13.1.1.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 14.0.0.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 14.1.0.6, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
12.1.0 ≤ v < 12.1.4.113.0.0 ≤ v < 13.1.1.514.0.0 ≤ v < 14.0.0.514.1.0 ≤ v < 14.1.0.6
Affected range stops below 12.1.4.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 13.1.1.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 14.0.0.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 14.1.0.6, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
12.1.0 ≤ v < 12.1.4.113.0.0 ≤ v < 13.1.1.514.0.0 ≤ v < 14.0.0.514.1.0 ≤ v < 14.1.0.6
Affected range stops below 12.1.4.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 13.1.1.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 14.0.0.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 14.1.0.6, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
12.1.0 ≤ v < 12.1.4.113.0.0 ≤ v < 13.1.1.514.0.0 ≤ v < 14.0.0.514.1.0 ≤ v < 14.1.0.6
Affected range stops below 12.1.4.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 13.1.1.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 14.0.0.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 14.1.0.6, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
12.1.0 ≤ v < 12.1.4.113.0.0 ≤ v < 13.1.1.514.0.0 ≤ v < 14.0.0.514.1.0 ≤ v < 14.1.0.6
Affected range stops below 12.1.4.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 13.1.1.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 14.0.0.5, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 14.1.0.6, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Remediation
No guide yetNo remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:
Patch and advisory references
References (2)
VDB Entryx_refsource_BIDThird Party Advisory
Source: [email protected]
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/109104x_refsource_CONFIRMVendor Advisory
Source: [email protected]
https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K64855220Quick Info
StatusMODIFIED
CWE
NVD-CWE-noinfo
Get alerted
Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack
Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.
Free plan, no card