CVE-2019-6605
N/A
Published: March 28, 2019 at 08:23 PM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 02:39 AM UTC
14 products affected across 2 vendorsBig IP Access Policy ManagerBig IP Application Security ManagerBig IP Advanced Firewall Manager
Using BIG-IP (LTM, AAM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, DNS, Edge Gateway, FPS, GTM, Link Controller, PEM, WebAccelerator) by BIG-IP?
Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect BIG-IP (LTM, AAM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, DNS, Edge Gateway, FPS, GTM, Link Controller, PEM, WebAccelerator) - before attackers find them.
Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
N/A
Exploit prediction
EPSS 2%
Description
On BIG-IP 11.5.1-11.5.8, 11.6.1-11.6.3, and 12.0.x, an undisclosed sequence of packets received by an SSL virtual server and processed by an associated Client SSL or Server SSL profile may cause a denial of service.
Affected
Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.
11.5.0 ≤ v < 11.5.911.6.0 ≤ v < 11.6.412.0.0 ≤ v < 12.1.0
Affected range stops below 11.5.9, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 11.6.4, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 12.1.0, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
11.5.0 ≤ v < 11.5.911.6.0 ≤ v < 11.6.412.0.0 ≤ v < 12.1.0
Affected range stops below 11.5.9, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 11.6.4, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 12.1.0, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
11.5.0 ≤ v < 11.5.911.6.0 ≤ v < 11.6.412.0.0 ≤ v < 12.1.0
Affected range stops below 11.5.9, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 11.6.4, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 12.1.0, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
11.5.0 ≤ v < 11.5.911.6.0 ≤ v < 11.6.412.0.0 ≤ v < 12.1.0
Affected range stops below 11.5.9, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 11.6.4, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 12.1.0, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
11.5.0 ≤ v < 11.5.911.6.0 ≤ v < 11.6.412.0.0 ≤ v < 12.1.0
Affected range stops below 11.5.9, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 11.6.4, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 12.1.0, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
11.5.0 ≤ v < 11.5.911.6.0 ≤ v < 11.6.412.0.0 ≤ v < 12.1.0
Affected range stops below 11.5.9, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 11.6.4, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 12.1.0, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
11.5.0 ≤ v < 11.5.911.6.0 ≤ v < 11.6.412.0.0 ≤ v < 12.1.0
Affected range stops below 11.5.9, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 11.6.4, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 12.1.0, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
11.5.0 ≤ v < 11.5.911.6.0 ≤ v < 11.6.412.0.0 ≤ v < 12.1.0
Affected range stops below 11.5.9, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 11.6.4, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 12.1.0, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
11.5.0 ≤ v < 11.5.911.6.0 ≤ v < 11.6.412.0.0 ≤ v < 12.1.0
Affected range stops below 11.5.9, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 11.6.4, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 12.1.0, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
11.5.0 ≤ v < 11.5.911.6.0 ≤ v < 11.6.412.0.0 ≤ v < 12.1.0
Affected range stops below 11.5.9, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 11.6.4, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 12.1.0, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Remediation
No guide yetNo remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:
Patch and advisory references
References (2)
VDB Entryx_refsource_BIDThird Party Advisory
Source: [email protected]
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107629x_refsource_MISCVendor Advisory
Source: [email protected]
https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K45353544Quick Info
StatusMODIFIED
CWE
NVD-CWE-noinfo
Get alerted
Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack
Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.
Free plan, no card