CVE-2019-5282

HIGH
7.8
CVSS Score
Published: November 13, 2019 at 01:28 PM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 02:37 AM UTC
14 products affected across 1 vendorEmily L29C FirmwareEmily AL00A FirmwareHima L29C Firmware

Using Emily-AL00A, Emily-TL00B, Emily-L09C, Emily-L29C by N/A?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Emily-AL00A, Emily-TL00B, Emily-L09C, Emily-L29C - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
HIGH7.8
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.8%

Description

Bastet module of some Huawei smartphones with Versions earlier than Emily-AL00A 9.0.0.182(C00E82R1P21), Versions earlier than Emily-TL00B 9.0.0.182(C01E82R1P21), Versions earlier than Emily-L09C 9.0.0.203(C432E7R1P11), Versions earlier than Emily-L29C 9.0.0.203(C432E7R1P11), Versions earlier than Emily-L29C 9.0.0.202(C185E2R1P12) have a double free vulnerability. An attacker tricks the user into installing a malicious application, which frees on the same memory address twice. Successful exploit could result in malicious code execution.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

v < emily-al00a_9.0.0.182(c00e82r1p21)
Affected range stops below emily-al00a_9.0.0.182(c00e82r1p21), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
huawei-emily-al00a (same device)
v < emily-l09c_9.0.0.203(c432e7r1p11)
Affected range stops below emily-l09c_9.0.0.203(c432e7r1p11), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
huawei-emily-l09c (same device)
v < emily-l29c_9.0.0.202(c185e2r1p12)v < emily-l29c_9.0.0.203(c432e7r1p11)v < emily-l29c_9.0.0.205(c635e2r1p11)v < emily-l29c_9.0.0.207(c636e7r1p13)
Affected range stops below emily-l29c_9.0.0.202(c185e2r1p12), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below emily-l29c_9.0.0.203(c432e7r1p11), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below emily-l29c_9.0.0.205(c635e2r1p11), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below emily-l29c_9.0.0.207(c636e7r1p13), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
huawei-emily-l29c (same device)
v < emily-tl00b_9.0.0.182(c01e82r1p21)
Affected range stops below emily-tl00b_9.0.0.182(c01e82r1p21), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
huawei-emily-tl00b (same device)
v < hima-l09ca_9.0.0.198(c432e10r1p16)
Affected range stops below hima-l09ca_9.0.0.198(c432e10r1p16), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
huawei-hima-l09ca (same device)
v < hima-l29c_9.0.0.204(c636e10r2p1)
Affected range stops below hima-l29c_9.0.0.204(c636e10r2p1), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
huawei-hima-l29c (same device)
v < hima-l29ca_9.0.0.198(c432e10r1p16)
Affected range stops below hima-l29ca_9.0.0.198(c432e10r1p16), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
huawei-hima-l29ca (same device)

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

CVSS

Attack Vector
LOCAL
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
NONE
User Interaction
REQUIRED
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
HIGH
Integrity
HIGH
Availability
HIGH
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusMODIFIED
CWE
CWE-415

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card