CVE-2019-1600

Cisco FXOS and NX-OS Software Unauthorized Directory Access Vulnerability

MEDIUM
4.4
CVSS Score
Published: March 7, 2019 at 08:00 PM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 02:28 AM UTC
18 products affected across 1 vendorNx OSFirepower Extensible Operating SystemFirepower 9300

Using Firepower 4100 Series Next-Generation Firewalls by Cisco?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Firepower 4100 Series Next-Generation Firewalls - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
MEDIUM4.4
Exploit prediction
EPSS 0.4%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

A vulnerability in the file system permissions of Cisco FXOS Software and Cisco NX-OS Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to access sensitive information that is stored in the file system of an affected system. The vulnerability is due to improper implementation of file system permissions. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by accessing and modifying restricted files. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to access sensitive and critical files. Firepower 4100 Series Next-Generation Firewalls are affected in versions prior to 2.2.2.91 and 2.3.1.110. Firepower 9300 Series Next-Generation Firewalls are affected in versions prior to 2.2.2.91 and 2.3.1.110. MDS 9000 Series Multilayer Switches are affected in versions prior to 6.2(25), 8.1(1b), and 8.3(1). Nexus 3000 Series Switches are affected in versions prior to 7.0(3)I4(9) and 7.0(3)I7(4). Nexus 3500 Platform Switches are affected in versions prior to 6.0(2)A8(10) and 7.0(3)I7(4). Nexus 3600 Platform Switches are affected in versions prior to 7.0(3)F3(5). Nexus 2000, 5500, 5600, and 6000 Series Switches are affected in versions prior to 7.1(5)N1(1b) and 7.3(3)N1(1). Nexus 7000 and 7700 Series Switches are affected in versions prior to 6.2(22), 7.3(3)D1(1), and 8.2(3). Nexus 9000 Series Switches-Standalone are affected in versions prior to 7.0(3)I4(9) and 7.0(3)I7(4). Nexus 9500 R-Series Line Cards and Fabric Modules are affected in versions prior to 7.0(3)F3(5).

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

1.1 ≤ v < 2.2.2.912.3 ≤ v < 2.3.1.110
Affected range stops below 2.2.2.91, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 2.3.1.110, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
cisco-firepower-4100 (environment) · cisco-firepower-9300 (environment)
v < 6.0(2)a8(10)v < 6.2(22)v < 7.0(3)i4(9)v < 7.1(5)n1(1b)5.2. ≤ v < 6.2(25)7.0(3) ≤ v < 7.0(3)i7(4)7.0(3)f1 ≤ v < 7.0(3)f3(5)7.0(3)f3 ≤ v < 7.0(3)f3(5)7.0(3)i5 ≤ v < 7.0(3)i7(4)7.2 ≤ v < 7.3(3)d1(1)7.2 ≤ v < 7.3(3)n1(1)7.3 ≤ v < 8.1(1b)8.0 ≤ v < 8.2(3)8.2 ≤ v < 8.3(1)
Affected range stops below 6.0(2)a8(10), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 6.2(22), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 6.2(25), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.0(3)f3(5), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.0(3)i4(9), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.0(3)i7(4), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.1(5)n1(1b), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.3(3)d1(1), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.3(3)n1(1), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 8.1(1b), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 8.2(3), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 8.3(1), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
cisco-mds-9000 (environment) · cisco-nexus-2000 (environment) · cisco-nexus-3000 (environment) · cisco-nexus-3500 (environment) · cisco-nexus-3600 (environment) · cisco-nexus-5500 (environment) · cisco-nexus-5600 (environment) · cisco-nexus-6000 (environment) · cisco-nexus-7000 (environment) · cisco-nexus-7700 (environment) · cisco-nexus-9000 (environment) · cisco-nexus-9500 (environment)
v < 2.2.2.91v < 2.3.1.110
Affected range stops below 2.2.2.91, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 2.3.1.110, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 2.2.2.91v < 2.3.1.110
Affected range stops below 2.2.2.91, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 2.3.1.110, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 6.2(25)v < 8.1(1b)v < 8.3(1)
Affected range stops below 6.2(25), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 8.1(1b), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 8.3(1), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 7.1(5)N1(1b)v < 7.3(3)N1(1)
Affected range stops below 7.1(5)N1(1b), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.3(3)N1(1), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 7.0(3)I4(9)v < 7.0(3)I7(4)
Affected range stops below 7.0(3)I4(9), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.0(3)I7(4), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 6.0(2)A8(10)v < 7.0(3)I7(4)
Affected range stops below 6.0(2)A8(10), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.0(3)I7(4), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 7.0(3)F3(5)
Affected range stops below 7.0(3)F3(5), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 7.1(5)N1(1b)v < 7.3(3)N1(1)
Affected range stops below 7.1(5)N1(1b), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.3(3)N1(1), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

References (3)

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitNot automatableTotal impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

Attack Vector
LOCAL
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
HIGH
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
HIGH
Integrity
NONE
Availability
NONE
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusMODIFIED
CWE
CWE-264CWE-732

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card