CVE-2019-1599

Cisco NX-OS Software Netstack Denial of Service Vulnerability

HIGH
8.6
CVSS Score
Published: March 7, 2019 at 08:00 PM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 02:28 AM UTC
18 products affected across 1 vendorNx OSUcs 6300Ucs 6200

Using Nexus 1000V Switch for Microsoft Hyper-V by Cisco?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Nexus 1000V Switch for Microsoft Hyper-V - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
HIGH8.6
Exploit prediction
EPSS 14%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

A vulnerability in the network stack of Cisco NX-OS Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on the affected device. The vulnerability is due to an issue with allocating and freeing memory buffers in the network stack. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted TCP streams to an affected device in a sustained way. A successful exploit could cause the network stack of an affected device to run out of available buffers, impairing operations of control plane and management plane protocols, resulting in a DoS condition. Note: This vulnerability can be triggered only by traffic that is destined to an affected device and cannot be exploited using traffic that transits an affected device. Nexus 1000V Switch for Microsoft Hyper-V is affected in versions prior to 5.2(1)SM3(2.1). Nexus 1000V Switch for VMware vSphere is affected in versions prior to 5.2(1)SV3(4.1a). Nexus 3000 Series Switches are affected in versions prior to 7.0(3)I7(6) and 9.2(2). Nexus 3500 Platform Switches are affected in versions prior to 6.0(2)A8(11), 7.0(3)I7(6), and 9.2(2). Nexus 3600 Platform Switches are affected in versions prior to 7.0(3)F3(5) and 9.2(2). Nexus 5500, 5600, and 6000 Series Switches are affected in versions prior to 7.1(5)N1(1b) and 7.3(5)N1(1). Nexus 7000 and 7700 Series Switches are affected in versions prior to 6.2(22. Nexus 9500 R-Series Line Cards and Fabric Modules are affected in versions prior to 7.0(3)F3(5) and 9.2(2). UCS 6200 and 6300 Series Fabric Interconnect are affected in versions prior to 3.2(3j) and 4.0(2a). UCS 6400 Series Fabric Interconnect are affected in versions prior to 4.0(2a).

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

v < 3.2(3j)v < 5.2(1)sm3(2.1)v < 5.2(1)sv3(4.1a)v < 6.0(2)a8(11)v < 6.2(22)v < 7.0(3)i4(9)v < 7.1(5)n1(1b)4.0 ≤ v < 4.0(2a)7.0(3) ≤ v < 7.0(3)f3(5)7.0(3) ≤ v < 7.0(3)i7(5)7.0(3)i5 ≤ v < 7.0(3)i7(6)7.2 ≤ v < 7.3(3)d1(1)7.2 ≤ v < 7.3(5)n1(1)8.0 ≤ v < 8.2(3)8.3 ≤ v < 8.3(2)9.2 ≤ v < 9.2(2)
Affected range stops below 3.2(3j), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 4.0(2a), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 5.2(1)sm3(2.1), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 5.2(1)sv3(4.1a), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 6.0(2)a8(11), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 6.2(22), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.0(3)f3(5), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.0(3)i4(9), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.0(3)i7(5), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.0(3)i7(6), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.1(5)n1(1b), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.3(3)d1(1), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.3(5)n1(1), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 8.2(3), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 8.3(2), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.2(2), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
cisco-nexus-1000v (environment) · cisco-nexus-3000 (environment) · cisco-nexus-3500 (environment) · cisco-nexus-3600 (environment) · cisco-nexus-5500 (environment) · cisco-nexus-5600 (environment) · cisco-nexus-6000 (environment) · cisco-nexus-7000 (environment) · cisco-nexus-7700 (environment) · cisco-nexus-9000 (environment) · cisco-nexus-9500 (environment) · cisco-ucs-6200 (environment) · cisco-ucs-6300 (environment) · cisco-ucs-6400 (environment)
v < 5.2(1)SM3(2.1)v < 5.2(1)SV3(4.1a)
Affected range stops below 5.2(1)SM3(2.1), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 5.2(1)SV3(4.1a), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 7.0(3)I7(6)v < 9.2(2)
Affected range stops below 7.0(3)I7(6), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.2(2), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 6.0(2)A8(11)v < 7.0(3)I7(6)v < 9.2(2)
Affected range stops below 6.0(2)A8(11), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.0(3)I7(6), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.2(2), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 7.0(3)F3(5)v < 9.2(2)
Affected range stops below 7.0(3)F3(5), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 9.2(2), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 7.1(5)N1(1b)v < 7.3(5)N1(1)
Affected range stops below 7.1(5)N1(1b), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.3(5)N1(1), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 7.1(5)N1(1b)v < 7.3(5)N1(1)
Affected range stops below 7.1(5)N1(1b), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.3(5)N1(1), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 7.1(5)N1(1b)v < 7.3(5)N1(1)
Affected range stops below 7.1(5)N1(1b), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.3(5)N1(1), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 6.2(22)v < 7.3(3)D1(1)v < 8.2(3)v < 8.3(2)
Affected range stops below 6.2(22), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.3(3)D1(1), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 8.2(3), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 8.3(2), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 6.2(22)v < 7.3(3)D1(1)v < 8.2(3)v < 8.3(2)
Affected range stops below 6.2(22), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.3(3)D1(1), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 8.2(3), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 8.3(2), so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitAutomatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

Attack Vector
NETWORK
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
NONE
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
CHANGED
Confidentiality
NONE
Integrity
NONE
Availability
HIGH
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusMODIFIED
CWE
CWE-399CWE-770

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card