CVE-2019-0349

N/A
Published: August 14, 2019 at 02:54 PM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 02:08 AM UTC
6 products affected across 1 vendorAdvanced Business Application Programming Platform KernelSAP KernelSAP Kernel (KRNL32UC)

Using SAP Kernel (KRNL32NUC) by SAP SE?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect SAP Kernel (KRNL32NUC) - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
N/A
Exploit prediction
EPSS 1%

Description

SAP Kernel (ABAP Debugger), versions KRNL32NUC 7.21, 7.21EXT, 7.22, 7.22EXT, KRNL32UC 7.21, 7.21EXT, 7.22, 7.22EXT, KRNL64NUC 7.21, 7.21EXT, 7.22, 7.22EXT, 7.49, KRNL64UC 7.21, 7.21EXT, 7.22, 7.22EXT, 7.49, 7.73, KERNEL 7.21, 7.49, 7.53, 7.73, 7.75, 7.76, 7.77, allows a user to execute “Go to statement” without possessing the authorization S_DEVELOP DEBUG 02, resulting in Missing Authorization Check

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

v < 7.21v < 7.49v < 7.53v < 7.73v < 7.75v < 7.76v < 7.77
Affected range stops below 7.21, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.49, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.53, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.73, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.75, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.76, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.77, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 7.21v < 7.21EXTv < 7.22v < 7.22EXT
Affected range stops below 7.21, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.21EXT, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.22, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.22EXT, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 7.21v < 7.21EXTv < 7.22v < 7.22EXT
Affected range stops below 7.21, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.21EXT, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.22, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.22EXT, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 7.21v < 7.21EXTv < 7.22v < 7.22EXTv < 7.49
Affected range stops below 7.21, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.21EXT, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.22, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.22EXT, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.49, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 7.21v < 7.21EXTv < 7.22v < 7.22EXTv < 7.49v < 7.73
Affected range stops below 7.21, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.21EXT, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.22, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.22EXT, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.49, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 7.73, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

References (2)

CVSS

Confidentiality
PARTIAL
Integrity
PARTIAL
Availability
PARTIAL
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusMODIFIED
CWE
CWE-862

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card