CVE-2017-2312

N/A
Published: April 24, 2017 at 03:00 PM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 01:15 AM UTC
1 product affected across 1 vendorJunos

Using Junos OS with LDP enabled by Juniper Networks?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect Junos OS with LDP enabled - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
N/A
Exploit prediction
EPSS 2%

Description

On Juniper Networks devices running Junos OS affected versions and with LDP enabled, a specific LDP packet destined to the RE (Routing Engine) will consume a small amount of the memory allocated for the rpd (routing protocol daemon) process. Over time, repeatedly receiving this type of LDP packet(s) will cause the memory to exhaust and the rpd process to crash and restart. It is not possible to free up the memory that has been consumed without restarting the rpd process. This issue affects Junos OS based devices with either IPv4 or IPv6 LDP enabled via the [protocols ldp] configuration (the native IPv6 support for LDP is available in Junos OS 16.1 and higher). The interface on which the packet arrives needs to have LDP enabled. The affected Junos versions are: 13.3 prior to 13.3R10; 14.1 prior to 14.1R8; 14.2 prior to 14.2R7-S6 or 14.2R8; 15.1 prior to 15.1F2-S14, 15.1F6-S4, 15.1F7, 15.1R4-S7, 15.1R5; 15.1X49 before 15.1X49-D70; 15.1X53 before 15.1X53-D230, 15.1X53-D63, 15.1X53-D70; 16.1 before 16.1R2. 16.2R1 and all subsequent releases have a resolution for this vulnerability.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

Affected range stops below 13.3R10, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 14.1R8, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 14.2R7-S6, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 15.1F2-S14, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 15.1X49-D70, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 15.1X53-D230, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 16.1R2, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

Patch and advisory references

References (3)

VDB Entryx_refsource_BIDThird Party Advisory
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97611
x_refsource_CONFIRMMitigationVendor Advisory
https://kb.juniper.net/JSA10777

CVSS

Confidentiality
NONE
Integrity
NONE
Availability
COMPLETE
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusMODIFIED
CWE
CWE-772

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card