CVE-2016-8610

HIGH
7.5
CVSS Score
Published: November 13, 2017 at 10:00 PM UTC
Updated: June 17, 2026 at 12:54 AM UTC
53 products affected across 7 vendorsDebian LinuxEnterprise Linux DesktopEnterprise Linux Server

Using OpenSSL by OpenSSL?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect OpenSSL - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
HIGH7.5
Exploit prediction
EPSS 40%

Description

A denial of service flaw was found in OpenSSL 0.9.8, 1.0.1, 1.0.2 through 1.0.2h, and 1.1.0 in the way the TLS/SSL protocol defined processing of ALERT packets during a connection handshake. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make a TLS/SSL server consume an excessive amount of CPU and fail to accept connections from other clients.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

v < xcp2361xcp3000 ≤ v < xcp3070
Affected range stops below xcp2361, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below xcp3070, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
fujitsu-m10-1 (same device)
v < xcp2361xcp3000 ≤ v < xcp3070
Affected range stops below xcp2361, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below xcp3070, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
fujitsu-m10-4 (same device)
v < xcp2361xcp3000 ≤ v < xcp3070
Affected range stops below xcp2361, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below xcp3070, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
fujitsu-m10-4s (same device)
v < xcp2361xcp3000 ≤ v < xcp3070
Affected range stops below xcp2361, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below xcp3070, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
fujitsu-m12-1 (same device)
v < xcp2361xcp3000 ≤ v < xcp3070
Affected range stops below xcp2361, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below xcp3070, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
fujitsu-m12-2 (same device)
v < xcp2361xcp3000 ≤ v < xcp3070
Affected range stops below xcp2361, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below xcp3070, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
fujitsu-m12-2s (same device)
All versions
netapp-cn1610 (same device)

References (28)

Vendor Advisoryx_refsource_REDHATThird Party Advisory
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0286.html
Vendor Advisoryx_refsource_REDHATThird Party Advisory
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0574.html
Vendor Advisoryx_refsource_REDHATThird Party Advisory
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1415.html
Vendor Advisoryx_refsource_REDHATThird Party Advisory
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1659.html
Mailing Listx_refsource_MLISTThird Party Advisory
http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q4/224
VDB Entryx_refsource_BIDThird Party Advisory
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93841
VDB Entryx_refsource_SECTRACKThird Party Advisory
http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037084
Vendor Advisoryx_refsource_REDHATThird Party Advisory
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1413

CVSS

Attack Vector
NETWORK
Complexity
LOW
Privileges
NONE
User Interaction
NONE
Scope
UNCHANGED
Confidentiality
NONE
Integrity
NONE
Availability
HIGH
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusMODIFIED
CWE
CWE-400

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card