© 2026 vulntracker.io

CVE-2016-2107

MEDIUM

5.9

CVSS Score

Published: May 5, 2016 at 12:00 AM UTC

Updated: June 17, 2026 at 12:43 AM UTC

15 products affected across 8 vendorsDebian LinuxAndroidUbuntu Linux

Using N/A by N/A?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect N/A - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available

Start Free Sign In

Severity

MEDIUM5.9

Exploit prediction

EPSS 89%

Description

The AES-NI implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h does not consider memory allocation during a certain padding check, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive cleartext information via a padding-oracle attack against an AES CBC session. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2013-0169.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

Ubuntu Linux · Canonicalrubygems

95%

12.04 14.04 15.10 16.04

Debian Linux · Debiandrupal

95%

Android · Google

95%

4.0 4.0.1 4.0.2 4.0.3 4.0.4 4.1 4.1.2 4.2 4.2.1 4.2.2 4.3 4.3.1 4.4 4.4.1 4.4.2 4.4.3 5.0 5.0.1 5.1 5.1.0

Helion Openstack · HP

95%

2.0.0 2.1.0 2.1.2 2.1.4

Node.js · Node.js

95%

0.10.0 ≤ v < 0.10.450.12.0 ≤ v < 0.12.144.0.0 ≤ v ≤ 4.1.24.2.0 ≤ v < 4.4.45.0.0 ≤ v < 5.11.16.0.0

Affected range stops below 0.10.45, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Affected range stops below 0.12.14, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Affected range stops below 4.4.4, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Affected range stops below 5.11.1, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

OpenSSL · OpenSSL

95%

v ≤ 1.0.1s1.0.2 1.0.2 beta1 1.0.2 beta2 1.0.2 beta3 1.0.2a 1.0.2b 1.0.2c 1.0.2d 1.0.2e 1.0.2f 1.0.2g

Leap · openSUSEdrupal

95%

openSUSE · openSUSE

95%

Enterprise Linux Desktop · Red Hatrubygems

95%

Enterprise Linux Hpc Node · Red Hat

95%

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

Patch and advisory references

References (58)

Third Party Advisory

Source: [email protected]

http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759

Vendor Advisoryx_refsource_APPLEMailing ListThird Party Advisory

Source: [email protected]

http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Jul/msg00000.html

Vendor AdvisoryMailing ListThird Party Advisory

Source: [email protected]

http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/183457.html

Vendor AdvisoryMailing ListThird Party Advisory

Source: [email protected]

http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/183607.html

Vendor AdvisoryMailing ListThird Party Advisory

Source: [email protected]

http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/184605.html

Vendor AdvisoryMailing ListThird Party Advisory

Source: [email protected]

http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00001.html

Vendor AdvisoryMailing ListThird Party Advisory

Source: [email protected]

http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00008.html

Vendor AdvisoryMailing ListThird Party Advisory

Source: [email protected]

http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00011.html

CVSS

5.9MEDIUM[email protected]

Attack Vector: NETWORK
Complexity: HIGH
Privileges: NONE
User Interaction: NONE
Scope: UNCHANGED
Confidentiality: HIGH
Integrity: NONE
Availability: NONE

Vector?

Quick Info

StatusMODIFIED

CWE

CWE-200CWE-310

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Create account Sign in

Free plan, no card