CVE-2013-0340

N/A
Published: January 21, 2014 at 06:00 PM UTC
Updated: October 14, 2026 at 07:16 AM UTC
7 products affected across 3 vendorsmacOSiPhone OSiPadOS

Using N/A by N/A?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect N/A - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
N/A
Exploit prediction
EPSS 19%
SSVC
No known exploit

Description

expat 2.1.0 and earlier does not properly handle entities expansion unless an application developer uses the XML_SetEntityDeclHandler function, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource consumption), send HTTP requests to intranet servers, or read arbitrary files via a crafted XML document, aka an XML External Entity (XXE) issue. NOTE: it could be argued that because expat already provides the ability to disable external entity expansion, the responsibility for resolving this issue lies with application developers; according to this argument, this entry should be REJECTed, and each affected application would need its own CVE.

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

v < 14.8
Affected range stops below 14.8, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 14.8
Affected range stops below 14.8, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 11.6
Affected range stops below 11.6, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 15.0
Affected range stops below 15.0, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 8.0
Affected range stops below 8.0, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
v < 2.4.0
Affected range stops below 2.4.0, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
3.6.0 ≤ v < 3.6.153.7.0 ≤ v < 3.7.123.8.0 ≤ v < 3.8.123.9.0 ≤ v < 3.9.7
Affected range stops below 3.6.15, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 3.7.12, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 3.8.12, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
Affected range stops below 3.9.7, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

Patch and advisory references

References (26)

Mailing Listx_refsource_MLISTExploitThird Party Advisory
http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/02/22/3
Mailing Listx_refsource_FULLDISCThird Party Advisory
http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Oct/61
Mailing Listx_refsource_FULLDISCThird Party Advisory
http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Oct/62
Mailing Listx_refsource_FULLDISCThird Party Advisory
http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Oct/63
Mailing Listx_refsource_FULLDISCThird Party Advisory
http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Sep/33
Mailing Listx_refsource_FULLDISCThird Party Advisory
http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Sep/34
Mailing Listx_refsource_FULLDISCThird Party Advisory
http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Sep/35
Mailing Listx_refsource_FULLDISCThird Party Advisory
http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Sep/38

SSVC — Action Prioritization

SSVCNo known exploitAutomatablePartial impact

SSVC signals action urgency (what to patch first), separate from CVSS which measures severity.

CVSS

Confidentiality
PARTIAL
Integrity
PARTIAL
Availability
PARTIAL
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusMODIFIED
CWE
CWE-611

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card