CVE-2006-1137

N/A
Published: March 10, 2006 at 02:00 AM UTC
Updated: June 16, 2026 at 10:22 PM UTC
12 products affected across 1 vendorCopycentre C65 FirmwareWorkcentre Pro 90 FirmwareWorkcentre Pro 65 Firmware

Using N/A by N/A?

Get instant alerts when new vulnerabilities affect N/A - before attackers find them.

Real-time alertsTrack your software stackFree plan available
Severity
N/A
Exploit prediction
EPSS 4%

Description

Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Xerox CopyCentre and Xerox WorkCentre Pro, running software 1.001.02.073 or earlier, or 1.001.02.074 before 1.001.02.715, allow remote attackers to cause an unspecified denial of service via a crafted PostScript file that will (1) "navigate through the directory" or (2) a "file sent to expose TCP/IP ports".

Affected

Our own answer: ranges merged, affected separated from platform-only, with confidence and review flags.

v ≤ 1.001.02.0731.001.02.074 ≤ v < 1.001.02.715
Affected range stops below 1.001.02.715, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
xerox-copycentre-c65 (same device)
v ≤ 1.001.02.0731.001.02.074 ≤ v < 1.001.02.715
Affected range stops below 1.001.02.715, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
xerox-copycentre-c75 (same device)
v ≤ 1.001.02.0731.001.02.074 ≤ v < 1.001.02.715
Affected range stops below 1.001.02.715, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
xerox-copycentre-c90 (same device)
v ≤ 1.001.02.0731.001.02.074 ≤ v < 1.001.02.715
Affected range stops below 1.001.02.715, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
xerox-workcentre-pro-65 (same device)
v ≤ 1.001.02.0731.001.02.074 ≤ v < 1.001.02.715
Affected range stops below 1.001.02.715, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
xerox-workcentre-pro-75 (same device)
v ≤ 1.001.02.0731.001.02.074 ≤ v < 1.001.02.715
Affected range stops below 1.001.02.715, so it looks safe — our inference, not a vendor statement
xerox-workcentre-pro-90 (same device)
All versions
All versions
All versions
All versions

Remediation

No guide yet

No remediation guidance has been written for this CVE yet. What the record does show:

References (9)

Third Party Advisoryx_refsource_SECUNIA
http://secunia.com/advisories/19146
VDB Entryx_refsource_SECTRACKThird Party Advisory
http://securitytracker.com/id?1015738
VDB Entryx_refsource_OSVDBBroken Link
http://www.osvdb.org/23725
VDB Entryx_refsource_OSVDBBroken Link
http://www.osvdb.org/23726
VDB Entryx_refsource_BIDThird Party Advisory
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/17014
VDB Entryx_refsource_VUPENPermissions RequiredThird Party Advisory
http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/0857
x_refsource_CONFIRMBroken LinkVendor Advisory
http://www.xerox.com/downloads/usa/en/c/cert_XRX06_002.pdf
VDB Entryx_refsource_XFThird Party Advisory
https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/25173

CVSS

Confidentiality
NONE
Integrity
NONE
Availability
PARTIAL
Vector?

Quick Info

StatusMODIFIED
CWE
NVD-CWE-Other

Get alerted

Stop reading CVE feeds looking for your own stack

Track the products you run and VulnTracker tells you when a new CVE affects them — with what is known about fixing it, and nothing about the rest.

Free plan, no card